Not So Fast! How about that citizenship “President-elect” Obama? (Updated)
My original November 15, 2008, article is updated here as this is a crucial matter in respect to our Constitution and who we accept in the office of President. It is surreal that Barack Obama has refused to release the records necessary to resolve the matter of his eligibility to be president. Ignoring this will not change the Constitution, nor will those concerned allow the matter to wither away. Either Barack Obama is or is not eligible to be President of the United States.
In the continuing news surrounding Obama’s citizenship is Janet Porter’s claim that Obama did not get his first passport until after becoming a U.S. Senator. This adds weight to his non-U.S. citizenship as his primary or declared citizenship. Did he travel to Pakistan using his Indonesian, Kenyan, or British citizenship? Porter notes that his 1981 travel to Indonesia and Pakistan were after his mother’s 1980 return from Indonesia and divorce from her Indonesian husband. Thus, adding more questions to Obama’s story and credibility as he claimed to have traveled first to see her, then to go on to Pakistan for a three week visit. She also revisits earlier questions about his allegedly forged birth certificate released by the campaign that has been repeatedly called into question.
As I previous wrote…
A new challenge to Senator Barack Obama’s citizenship was filed November 12th in California demanding that the court stop certification of the election results until the state’s secretary of state can ascertain from Senator Obama his legal qualification to be a candidate for President. This 18 page petition is a quick read. It offers a good summary of what is at stake and the questions that surround Senator Obama’s citizenship.
Obama Seeks to Spread the Wealth à la Karl Marx
Several weeks ago Barack Obama smoothly explained to “Joe the Plumber” that he wanted to spread Joe’s wealth around (See Barack Obama Meets “Joe the Plumber”). He advocated taking the wealth of successful Americans and giving it to others as the government saw fit. Barack Obama introduced a heretofor unseen side of his ideology — Marxism.
From each according to his ability, to each according to his need – Karl Marx, 1875.
When asked on Good Morning America (October 24, around 2 minutes), Barack Obama said he did not regret his ‘spread the wealth’ comment. Why should he? His socialist and Marxist past and ideology is coming into sharp focus and out-of-the-closet so-to-speak (See, for example, my article, Obama is Hiding a Radical Past). Past complaints about Obama not having any discernable ideology can now be firmly laid to rest.
In a 2001 public radio interview (see below the fold), Obama clearly faulted the Supreme Court for not reinterpreting the U.S. Constitution to force redistribution of wealth and faulted the civil rights movement for not doing more “political and community organizing and activities on the ground.…to put together the actual coalitions of power through which you bring about redistributive change.”
Obama aligned himself with a socialist party in 1996 and has longstanding ties to Marxists (e.g., Bill Ayers, Mike Klonsky) who have a record of attacking the United States.
In about one week the American public will have a choice of voting for Barack Obama, a man with personal and professional ties to people espousing Marxist and socialist ideologies, or John McCain, an American patriot who has fought Marxism.
Previous Posts
- Mr. President: Boycott Copenhagen; Investigate Your Climate Change “Experts” – Sarah Palin (December 3, 2009)
Governor Sarah Palin on Climategate: The president’s decision to attend the international climate conference in Copenhagen needs to be reconsidered in light of the unfolding Climategate scandal. The leaked e-mails involved in Climategate expose the unscientific behavior of leading climate scientists who deliberately destroyed records to block information requests, manipulated data to “hide the decline” in - Obama’s War of 1,000 Cuts (December 2, 2009)
Yes, Afghanistan is now Obama’s War. It was his since inauguration but make no mistake, from last night’s speech, it is clearly his and we can no longer blame Bush for the mess. Obama has now created the recipe for his own disaster: First, the military asked for as much as 60,000 troops, Obama gives them half, and Second, while - An Easy Mark (November 30, 2009)
I created this Web site originally during the 2008 elections in response to the apparent gullibility of the American people to follow whatever the mainstream media (MSM) tells them to do or think. I worry that too many people act like sheep or in some circumstances, lemmings. They don’t think for themselves, they don’t act for themselves, and - Global Warming? Show me the data! (November 30, 2009)
It is now reasonable to label global warming, more formally known as Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) a fraud perpetrated by a group of self-serving scientists, doomsayers, and wannabes. For years we’ve been bombarded with scary forecasts and dire reports of man-made catastrophe. Skepticism was met with dismissive ridicule as deniers, equating critics with Holocaust deniers. Fascism was the modis operandi - Time for Obama to Reset? No, Time for Obama to Resign (November 28, 2009)
Politico asks “Should Obama hit the reset button on the White House? If so, where might he find it?” My thoughts as I wrote to Politico and as they have now published: Should Obama hit the reset button? You’re kidding right?! Step One: Obama should apologize for bankrupting the country, going around the world and apologizing for us as if it - Ten stupid qualifiers makes for one big loser of a party (November 27, 2009)
Yep, 10 unelected members of the Republican Party are working hard to ensure defeat in next year’s election with their proposed litmus test of party members. Now, as I’ve made clear on my Web site, I am registered as a Republican but pretty much in name only. I truly consider myself an independent. Working my way through the proposed statements that I must - Hey guys, we’ve got a problem – George Monbiont (November 25, 2009)
George Monbiont – never heard of him until this past week – is out with another ‘we got a problem’ article in the Guardian today as he frets over the damage being done to the religion of global warming [and his career] by the actions and incompetence of the scientific community. Interesting that other than his buried apology in a comment attached - Didn’t anyone ever look at the code?! (November 25, 2009)
There are several updates from folks reviewing the CRU software code that paint a devestating picture of the science of global warming (More below). As I read these, I keep coming back to the 1960 date. Newer data did not bear out global warming which global warming advocates had staked their careers. Therefore they played with it and made it up - CRU Code Review (November 25, 2009)
A lot of folks are looking at the CRU Code that lays the foundation for the fraud of global warming. Bishop Hill has a growing list of findings (below). Bore Patch offers another take (above). Here is a snapshot of the list from Bishop Hill (Visit for updates): Francis at L’Ombré De L’Olivier says the coding language is inappropriate. Also inappropriate use - About George Monbiot’s “Apology” (November 24, 2009)
Anthony Watts (WattsUpWithThat) and Andrew Bolt (Herald Sun) are out with new posts and articles noting a so-called “apology” from George Monbiot, “one of the fiercest media propagandists of the warming faith.” (Watts). What apology?! First, take a look at what George Monbiot writes on his blog: It’s no use pretending that this isn’t a major blow. The emails extracted by